There are so many articles touting SEO tips the topic has almost gone beyond the boundaries of social acceptability, and yet they all still have their problems.
It would be ironic if only the authors were a bit more self-aware, that SEO posts tend to be written for SEO themselves and are then littered with oversimplifications, outdated ideas, clumsy rules of thumb and thoughtless suggestions.
Another reason there are so many SEO tips articles is because the algorithms behind Google’s rankings have historically changed a lot. However, Google introduced RankBrain a couple of years ago which was essentially the point from which SEO is now done by AI rather than a series of more discrete algorithms.
Get all the resources you need to write professional press releases and turbo charge your media coverage with our Startup Press Release Toolkit:
Reading through all the SEO tips and hints, it seems that the principles which underpin everything are few, sensible and far more helpful that the tips themselves which may well be short-lived and generalised. I’m going to stick with two principles.
I’m actually going to start with the second one, which mainly refers to keyword stuffing. Lots of SEOs thought they were very clever in cramming loads of keywords into content in order to trick search engines into giving them a higher ranking. Once Google and the like recognised it their search engines began to avoid pages which used these tactics. This doesn’t really matter beyond a little motto: Shortcuts work for a short time. If companies like Google are going to keep their search engines working for their users they can’t have people hacking their functionality.
The first point is the most pertinent because it basically describes everything else. What Google wants to know is that the results they’ve delivered have been useful for the users, just give the people what they want. It’s important to remember this beyond the tips which generally tell you to use keywords, have plenty of content, provide internal and external links and make sure your content is organised. What underpins these tips is the user experience which is what Google are after, and we can take these tips in turn because each have changed from hackable to not hackable since RankBrain came along.
As I mentioned, keywords stuffing is no longer cool and will lower your ranking. So what should be done now? It’s best to focus on just one or two keywords first of all, to make sure your article is much more honed. This sounds like just employing the opposite of keyword stuffing but really it goes to the heart of user expectation. If someone opens up their search engine and types in a phrase which happens to be the exact keyword you used for an article then your article may well appear. The user then clicks on it and starts reading. If your article turns out to not be focused on that keyword they will probably click off the article and look for something else.
Google doesn’t want anyone having to attempt multiple searches, that’s a bad user experience of its search engine’s capability. It also doesn’t particularly benefit your website, because no one is going to spend much time somewhere they didn’t intend to be. So the most important thing is to ascertain exactly what your article is about and what people will type into a search engine if they wanted to know the thing that your article is about. Using a keyword is a new addition bequeathed to the process of writing by the internet, but really what is true now of writing has always been true: say what you mean.
So here’s the thing. There are two versions of “plenty of content”, one refers to the number of posts and the other refers to the length of each post. It’s always been true that the number of posts should be high because it means you’re capable of hitting a variety of keywords, drawing interest from a broader range of people, getting more views and increasing your sites ranking.
The second version is where thinking has changed. It used to be the case that having lots of posts was so important that SEOs would advise to keep article length around 300 words and pump out plenty of articles. Now that’s slightly different. Another way Google measures whether it was successful in delivering you what you want is the amount of time you spend on a page. People aren’t likely to spend much time reading short posts. The actual length varies wildly, I’ve seen suggestions of 800-1,200 all the way through to 2,500.
Basically, longer is better, though you’d have to be a better writer to keep the reader’s interest for that longer. But what is ultimately true, has always been true and will always be true is that your post should be as long as is appropriate for what you’re trying to say.
Want to gain more exposure and press coverage for your startup or business and don’t know where to start? Visit our email contact list of the top tech reporters around, or download our free eBook and get The Ultimate Email Database Of Tech Reporters & Newspaper Journalists.
Internal links and external links are kind of the same thing from two different perspectives. Internal links and other websites linking to your site are one of the ways Google ascertains how relevant and popular your site is, not just to users but to other writers. It acts like a peer recommendation.
External links should be to content which has the same or a similar keyword, which in turn boosts the ranking of the site you link to and the strength of the focus of your article on its keyword. If you write an article with the keyword “cryptocurrency” and then link the an article about an art gallery, Google may reasonably surmise your content is a bit confused.
Again, more recently RankBrain can work out when you’re just trying to stuff your article with links. Maybe there’s an optimum number, but don’t worry about that. RankBrain is going to start learning human behaviour and any marketing ploys will just confuse the situation. Think of them like any grammatical device: use them where appropriate and don’t use them where not appropriate.
Shocking, right? This used to refer to things like website categories, making sure you haven’t got two articles with the same keyword, and splitting longer articles with useful subheadings which use the keyword. This is all still true but what is becoming truer with RankBrain is the user experience of your website.
As I mentioned earlier, the longer people spend on your website once they’ve clicked on it from Google, the higher the ranking Google will offer you. So if your website is pretty, and well organised, and makes useful suggestions, and easily navigable then this will happen. Those old HTML pages of the past won’t work anymore.
This article is all about a single and simple trend which we can assume to become truer and truer over the next couple of years. Technology like RankBrain means that search engines want to optimise their results for user behaviour. The old set of algorithms would require Google engineers to guess at user behaviour and then write algorithms for the search engine to appeal to. These were usually proxies, hacks, shortcuts, and the like – they were the best the engineers had to work with at the time.
With RankBrain, none of that’s true, the AI will be able to simply learn about humans, their behaviour and what they want to see. What does all this mean? Clickbait headlines, short articles stuffed with keywords, listicles, quizzes, etc, have all been shown to be mere trends.
Search engines are going to start moving toward natural language processing and I wouldn’t be surprised if they started ditching things like keywords and links entirely in favour of as-yet-unknown ways of measuring genuine behaviour. Online writing, having deviated from print writing thus far, may well now return to its original form and purpose as technology becomes smart enough to measure it.
Learn how your startup can create a valuable PR strategy after investing time, effort and resources into a new venture: